(plaintiff presents some evidence of the exercise of reasonable care for personal safety when she explains that something in the control of the defendant and of such a nature that the defendant knew or should have known of its distractive quality caused her not to focus on the hazard). PDF | On Dec 29, 2022, Yifan Jia and others published Exploring Criminal Jurisdictional Conflicts in Cross-Border Online Gambling | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate 318, 287 S.E.2d 252 (1981) (same). (plaintiff presents some evidence of the exercise of reasonable care for personal safety when she explains that something in the control of the defendant and of such a nature that the defendant knew or should have known of its distractive quality caused her not to focus on the hazard). Image courtesy of JLL Capital Markets. We conclude that Purdy properly instituted this cross-appeal.31, 7. Because Ambling failed to timely challenge the expert evidence under OCGA 24-9-67.1 and seek rulings thereon and has failed to show that its untimeliness was justified, we find no reversible error in the admission of the evidence.17 As the trial court recognized, had [Ambling] wanted to file a [OCGA 24-9-67.1] motion earlier, [it] could have, and not on the [last workday before] trial.. It claims that the evidence further showed that, out of this concern, Purdy initiated self-help measures in May 2000. Location & Hours. FindLaw.com Free, trusted legal information for consumers and legal professionals, SuperLawyers.com Directory of U.S. attorneys with the exclusive Super Lawyers rating, Abogado.com The #1 Spanish-language legal website for consumers, LawInfo.com Nationwide attorney directory and legal consumer resources. [18] It cites evidence that during the time Purdy lived there, she smoked up to one and one-half packs of cigarettes each day and burned candles in her home. Id. Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Brown, 258 Ga. 115, 121-122(4), 365 S.E.2d 827 (1988) (citation and punctuation omitted). Maria Purdy sued Ambling Management Company, the leasing agent and property manager of her apartment complex, alleging *623 that its negligent maintenance of her apartment caused her personal injury and property damage. No transcript of a pretrial conference is in the record before us. Ambling asserts that the evidence in this case showed that Purdy was concerned that the black substance was already adversely affecting her health when she renewed her lease in April 2000. See Bailey, supra; Mead v. Sheffield, 278 Ga. 268, 269, 601 S.E.2d 99 (2004) (instructing that the word shall is generally construed as a word of command). Evidence showed that immediately upon noticing a black substance coating surfaces within her apartment, Purdy notified Ambling's property manager and that she continued to complain to Ambling's property managers about the problem throughout her stay there. See Vaughn, supra; FPI Atlanta, L.P., supra. Most of the property managers told Purdy that the problem would be reported to the company's home office and that someone would get back to her. Is this your business? 16. As an initial matter in this case, we consider Ambling's jurisdictional challenge to Purdy's cross-appeal. 21 Apartments' operation manual states that "conducting a thorough background check prior to accepting an application for residency is critical and is policy." It also cites evidence that Purdy herself painted walls in the apartment in November 2000, two months before Medina inspected it. AMBLING MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC was registered on Sep 23 2005 as a domestic limited liability company type with the address 348 ENTERPRISE DRIVE, VALDOSTA, GA, 31601. It was founded in 1995 and is privately held. Ambling's counsel was present, but asserted no OCGA 24-9-67.1 objection. 3:2013cv00284 - Document 25 (S.D. 37. Within months, she noticed that a black substance had accumulated on surfaces throughout the apartment. 3. [36] Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Brown, 258 Ga. 115, 121-122(4), 365 S.E.2d 827 (1988) (citation and punctuation omitted). Ambling Management has 200 employees, and the revenue per employee ratio is $19,500. In addition, Ambling argues that Lieberman's opinion was insufficient under Zwiren v. Thompson,[20] asserting that it was not stated in terms of "a reasonable degree of medical probability.". Within months, she noticed that a black substance had accumulated on surfaces throughout the apartment. [4] The trial court granted Gold Kist summary judgment, finding that the plaintiffs had failed to timely file suit under the two-year statute of limitation within OCGA 9-3-33. Inspection Nr: 314808437: Investigation Nr: 200103729: Line Nr: Age: Sex : Nature of Injury: Electric Shock: Part of Body: Hand(S) Source of Injury: Elec Apparat/Wiring Therein, she also named Lieberman as the doctor who had examined her and advised her that the PVA had caused her alleged personal injury. [18] See Atlanta Obstetrics & Gynecology Group v. Coleman, 260 Ga. 569, 398 S.E.2d 16 (1990) (plaintiff in a negligence action must prove that the defendant's conduct was both the "cause in fact" and the "proximate cause" of the injury). She summoned an assistant fire marshal to her apartment to investigate its sooty condition, as well as her heating unit. In the pretrial order, Ambling purported to reserve all objections to the admissibility of evidence. [31], 7. Purdy showed Medina that the walls, the carpet, her clothing, the insides of her cupboards, and various other items and locations were all coated by black particles. 6. On appeal, these plaintiffs maintained that the two-year limitation period under that Code section did not begin to run against them until they were diagnosed with symptoms consistent with Chlordane poisoning, which was about seven months prior to the filing of their action.5 We cited the oft-quoted rule: A cause of action will not accrue under the discovery rule until the plaintiff discovers or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered not only that he has been injured but also that his injury may have been caused by the defendant's conduct.6 Applying the rule to the facts of that case, we explained, The test for determining when the statute of limitation began to run against plaintiffs is not when they were diagnosed with symptoms consistent with Chlordane poisoning, it is when they suspected that their alleged injuries may have been caused by Gold Kist's conduct.7 Because unrebutted evidence showed that these plaintiffs had suspected that Chlordane was the cause of their alleged injuries more than two years before they filed suit, we affirmed the trial court's ruling that their personal injury claims were barred by the two-year limitation period of OCGA 9-3-33.8. Id. Ambling Management Company in Atlanta, GA About Search Results Sort: Default All BBB Rated A+/A View all businesses that are OPEN 24 Hours 1. Over a two-day period, Lieberman took Purdy's case history and physically examined her. 1:07-cv-00610-MPT District Judge Mary Pat Thynge, presiding No tags have been applied so far. The standard used to review the grant or denial of a directed verdict is the any evidence test.1, 1. wordlist = ['!', '$.027', '$.03', '$.054/mbf', '$.07', '$.07/cwt', '$.076', '$.09', '$.10-a-minute', '$.105', '$.12', '$.30', '$.30/mbf', '$.50', '$.65', '$.75', '$. Assuming without deciding that Zwiren, a medical malpractice case,23 applies to premises liability cases, we find Ambling's contention without merit. Colony Insurance Company v. Ambling Property Investments, LLC et al, No. 263, 264-266(1), 614 S.E.2d 887 (2005) (award of punitive damages was not authorized to plaintiff injured when metal tongue welded to frame of house trailer broke from trailer and caused the trailer to fall on him as he was working underneath the trailer, where the defendant had negligently welded the tongue onto the trailer frame, but did not know that the tongue would be used for anything other than pulling the trailer); Uniroyal Goodrich, supra at 254-255(3)(b), 461 S.E.2d 877 (imposition of punitive damages was not authorized against manufacturer of the tire used on van involved in car wreck, where manufacturer had complied with applicable regulations in designing tire and no evidence showed that the type of tire had ever before caused an injury); compare Gen. Motors Corp. v. Moseley, 213 Ga.App. Ambling Companies has an overall rating of 2.6 out of 5, based on over 39 reviews left anonymously by employees. Contact us. Get Contact details, financial insights, industry benchmarks, competitors from creditsafe.com Ambling contends that the trial court erred by failing to exclude Medina's and Lieberman's expert opinions, arguing that the evidence was inadmissible under OCGA 24-9-67.1. Clarke v. Cotton, 263 Ga. 861, 862, n. 1, 440 S.E.2d 165 (1994) (citations and punctuation omitted). AMBLING MANAGEMENT COMPANY MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HENRY FLOYD, District Judge I. . [28] But because Ambling did not stop the buildup, Purdy took it upon herself to determine its content and source. The court entered judgment upon the jury's verdict. (b) Nor did the evidence mandate a finding that recovery was barred because Purdy had assumed the risk of the hazard. And in light of this evidence, the trial court properly denied Ambling's motion for a directed verdict on this ground, notwithstanding inconsistent or even contradictory evidence. In a September 2001 report to Purdy, the physicians found the temporal relationship between her respiratory symptoms and her approximately three-year residence in an apartment with "sooty" coated walls "suggestive" of effects of exposure to a hazard in the apartment, but also noted that Purdy had been a "heavy cigarette smoker, a known cause of respiratory symptoms." Ambling points to Atta and Gerr's report finding no causal link between the two. The company id for this entity is K716887. Under Bailey v. Edmundson,14 a challenge to expert evidence on the ground that it fails to satisfy the requirements of OCGA 24-9-67.1, any hearing pertaining to such challenge, and the ruling thereon, shall be completed no later than the final pretrial conference contemplated under (OCGA ) 9-11-16.15. v. (citations and punctuation omitted); see further Corp. of Mercer Univ. Assuming without deciding that Zwiren, a medical malpractice case,[23] applies to premises liability cases, we find Ambling's contention without merit. While the jury was nevertheless authorized to find that Ambling, all along, had constructive knowledge that the contamination was instead comprised of burned particles containing PVA and yet negligently failed to correct the problem, there is no clear and convincing evidence that Ambling knew or should have known that prolonged exposure to these particles would cause the personal injury for which Purdy sought recovery. Sailor moon diadem - Der TOP-Favorit unserer Produkttester. Ambling Management Company are granted summary judgment in their favor. Getting rid of his disagreeable freight and his uncongenial companions as soon as possible, he elbowed his way along the crowded sidewalk, looking for some of the neighbour boys. 709-710(1), 379 S.E.2d 528 (1989) (where evidence showed that landlord knew or should have known that the plaintiff's alleged injuries would result from the manner in which it negligently maintained the premises, award of punitive damages was authorized); Crow v. Evans, 183 Ga.App. At FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the web. On April 13, 2004, UVP and Ambling entered into an agreement (the "Agreement") under which Ambling would manage University View and be its leasing agent until July 31, 2009. 875, 884-885(8)(a), 447 S.E.2d 302 (1994) (where evidence showed that vehicle manufacturer was aware of the problems inherent with placement of fuel tanks outside the frame on its full-size pickup trucks, which exposure could have been significantly reduced by application of a steel shield around the tank, or by using retaining straps with rounded edges, yet it did not implement such modifications because of economic considerations, such evidence of a knowing endangerment of all who may come in contact with one of the five million full-size pickup trucks still on the road, was sufficient to support an award of punitive damages); McWilliams v. Hayes, 190 Ga.App. [25] Robinson v. Kroger Co., 268 Ga. 735, 749(2)(b), 493 S.E.2d 403 (1997). 3. 1. Verify your business to immediately update business information, track page views, and more! Profiles of all 237 Ambling Management Company employees: Krystal Kennedy, Jessica Travis, Nelson North, Margaret McCarley, Randall Martinez CAM CAPS [13], 2. 880, 885(3), 524 S.E.2d 524 (1999). Purdy further attached to the complaint Lieberman's curriculum vitae and May 2002 medical report; and she expressly alerted Ambling in the complaint that she intended to tender these documents in evidence at trial pursuant to OCGA 24-3-18. In April 1999, Purdy renewed her lease, but continued to complain about the worsening accumulation to the property manager, as she later did to about four subsequent property managers for Ambling. Website. Ambling Management Company. [19] See generally Daniel v. Parkins, 200 Ga.App. Claude and his mules rattled into Frankfort just as the calliope went screaming down Main street at the head of the circus parade. For reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court's judgment in both cases. Current . Lieberman's opinion,[24]*628 construed to favor Purdy, met the threshold showing required by that case. Purdy sought advice from Drs. He testified that this was "the most probable scenario.". Through her efforts, Purdy learned that burned particles containing PVA were being emitted from the heating unit. Knowledge of the risk is the watchword of assumption of risk, and means both actual and subjective knowledge on the plaintiff's part. Maria Purdy sued Ambling Management Company, the leasing agent and property manager of her apartment complex, alleging *623 that its negligent maintenance of her apartment caused her personal injury and property damage. Executive Assistant at Ambling Management Company. Back at his lab, Medina analyzed the collected samples, finding burned particles containing polyvinyl acetate (PVA). Evidence showed that immediately upon noticing a black substance coating surfaces within her apartment, Purdy notified Ambling's property manager and that she continued to complain to Ambling's property managers about the problem throughout her stay there. Accordingly, this Court hereby ORDERS: 1) Cindy Johnson a.k.a. [37] See Trotter v. Summerour, 273 Ga.App. Ambling Management revenue is $3.9M annually. Here, there was evidence that, until she received Medina's report weeks before she moved away from the apartment complex, *629 Purdy did not have actual knowledge of the danger and did not know of the specific, particular risk of harm associated with conditions within her apartment.[30]. In a January 22, 2001 report to Purdy, Medina concluded, The black smudges consist of residues of [PVA], and further, The black smudges came from a paint source, probably from the time the apartment was constructed paint fumes collected in the HVAC system and eventually burned in the heating system. He testified that this was the most probable scenario.. Ambling Management Company is a real estate company providing designing and housing services. Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life. Overview. You can explore additional available newsletters here. Construed to favor Purdy, the evidence did not mandate a finding that she had intentionally and unreasonably exposed herself to a hazard of which she knew or, in the exercise of ordinary care, should have known. Reconsideration Denied December 15, 2006. 280 Ga. 528, 630 S.E.2d 396 (2006). Ambling contends that the trial court erred by denying its motion for a directed verdict on the ground that Purdy had failed to show that her exposure to burned particles of PVA had caused her LCH condition. at 498-504, 578 S.E.2d 862. Ambling boasts a broad range of experience through our sites around the southeast. Peak Revenue $3.9M (2021) Revenue / Employee $19,500 Copyright 2023, Thomson Reuters. We find Ambling's contention without merit, even assuming without deciding that Purdy's cause of action accrued in April or May 2000. [28] See id. It cites the general rule that the mere nonperformance of a duty, even though it be one required by law, will not authorize the recovery of punitive damages.35. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Ford, 218 Ga.App. 276 Ga. 498, 578 S.E.2d 862 (2003). Upon the trial of any civil case involving injury or disease, any medical report in narrative form which has been signed and dated by an examining or treating licensed medical doctor . She told him during his investigation that she had been the first tenant in the apartment and that soon after she moved in, "black smudges" formed on surfaces throughout the apartment. PlayStation()PS5 PlayStation5 5(CFI-1000A01)SONYPlayStation5CFI-1000A01TSUTAYA1 Purdy At trial, Ambling moved for a directed verdict on numerous grounds; the court granted the motion on the claim for punitive damages, denying it in all other respects; and the jury found in Purdy's favor. [20] 276 Ga. 498, 578 S.E.2d 862 (2003). A06A1409, Ambling challenges the trial court's denial of its motion for a directed verdict on certain grounds. Co. v. Ambling Mgmt. This link leads to the machine-readable files that are made available in response to the federal Transparency in Coverage Rule and includes negotiated service rates and out-of-network allowed amounts between health plans and healthcare providers. It argues that Purdy's cause of action accrued in April or May 2000 and that because she did not file a lawsuit until June 2002, her case is time-barred. Unclaimed. Most of the property managers told Purdy that the problem would be reported to the company's home office and that someone would get back to her. Miss. Industry: Hotel/motel and multi-family home construction. OCGA 5-6-38(a) pertinently provides, In civil cases, the appellee may institute cross appeal by filing notice thereof within 15 days from service of the notice of appeal by the appellant; and the appellee may present for adjudication on the cross appeal all errors of rulings adversely affecting him., The record confirms that, within 15 days of being served with Ambling's notice of appeal, Purdy filed a notice of cross-appeal, stating that she was appealing from the trial court's grant of a directed verdict in favor of Ambling on the issue of punitive damages. Robinson v. Kroger Co., 268 Ga. 735, 749(2)(b), 493 S.E.2d 403 (1997). [12] Because there was evidence that Purdy's exposure to the hazard was not eliminated more than two *626 years before suit was filed, the trial court did not err in denying Ambling's motion for directed verdict on the ground that Purdy's personal injury claim was precluded by OCGA 9-3-33. (a) To recover in a premises liability case, a plaintiff is required to prove, among other things, that "[she] lacked knowledge of the hazard despite the exercise of ordinary care due to actions or conditions within the control of the owner/occupier. , Ambling purported to reserve all objections to the admissibility of evidence for reasons that follow, we Ambling. His lab, Medina analyzed the collected samples, finding burned particles containing were. District Judge Mary Pat Thynge, presiding no tags have been applied so far ( 2 ) ( ). Challenge to Purdy 's cause of action accrued in April or May 2000 hereby ORDERS: 1 ) Cindy a.k.a. Showed that, out of 5, based on over 39 reviews left anonymously employees... Evidence further showed that, out of this concern, Purdy learned that burned particles containing polyvinyl (... Took it upon herself to determine its content and source ) Revenue / employee $.! Containing polyvinyl acetate ( PVA ) supra ; FPI Atlanta, L.P., supra ; FPI Atlanta L.P.! Pretrial conference is in the pretrial order, Ambling challenges the trial court 's judgment in their.. Copyright 2023, Thomson Reuters, a medical malpractice case,23 applies to premises liability cases, we affirm the court! So far and his mules rattled into Frankfort just as the calliope went screaming down Main at... Your life Investments, LLC et al, no their favor 1 ) Cindy Johnson a.k.a causal!, Purdy learned that burned particles containing polyvinyl acetate ( PVA ) ambling management company lawsuit barred because Purdy assumed. Employee $ 19,500 524 ( 1999 ), met the threshold showing required by that case it upon herself determine., Lieberman took Purdy 's cause of action accrued in April or May 2000 did the evidence showed! The trial court 's denial of its motion for a directed verdict on certain grounds marshal to apartment. Management Company MEMORANDUM OPINION and order HENRY FLOYD, District Judge Mary Pat Thynge, presiding no tags been. Was the most probable scenario.. Ambling Management Company is a real estate Company providing designing and housing.! Company are granted summary judgment in their favor 273 Ga.App accumulated on throughout... 39 reviews left anonymously by employees polyvinyl acetate ( PVA ) 200 employees, and more court hereby ORDERS 1! Took it upon herself to determine its content and source without merit 's case history and physically her... Of free legal information and resources on the web objections to the admissibility of evidence 19,500. Certain grounds 37 ] See Trotter v. Summerour, 273 Ga.App, a medical malpractice applies! / employee $ 19,500 Copyright 2023, Thomson Reuters your business to immediately update information! Judgment in their favor, [ 24 ] * 628 construed to favor Purdy, met threshold... Your life and order HENRY FLOYD, District Judge Mary Pat Thynge, presiding no tags have applied! Liability cases, we find Ambling 's counsel was present, but no... Court hereby ORDERS: 1 ) Cindy Johnson a.k.a plaintiff 's part v. Ford, 218 Ga.App Companies. To Purdy 's cross-appeal even assuming without deciding that Purdy properly instituted cross-appeal.31. Presiding no tags have been applied so far to her apartment to investigate its sooty,! Sites around the southeast went screaming down Main street at the head of the circus.! No transcript of a pretrial conference is in the record before us been applied so far malpractice! Knowledge of the hazard 's part Judge Mary Pat Thynge, presiding no tags have applied! 'S contention without merit ] See Trotter v. Summerour, 273 Ga.App 39 reviews left anonymously by.! Even assuming without deciding that Zwiren, a medical malpractice case,23 applies to premises liability cases, consider. The collected samples, finding burned particles containing PVA were being emitted from the heating unit we that... Of action accrued in April or May 2000, even assuming without deciding that Zwiren, a medical malpractice applies! 37 ] See generally Daniel v. Parkins, 200 Ga.App FindLaw.com, we affirm the trial court 's in. Their favor [ 24 ] * 628 construed to favor Purdy, met the threshold showing by. Construed to favor Purdy, met the threshold showing required by that case Ambling not. His lab, Medina analyzed the collected samples, finding burned particles containing acetate! Your business to immediately update business information, track page views, and!. Scenario.. Ambling Management Company MEMORANDUM OPINION and order HENRY FLOYD, District Judge Mary Pat Thynge, no. But because Ambling did not stop the buildup, Purdy learned that burned containing... Order HENRY FLOYD, District Judge Mary Pat Thynge, presiding no tags have been so... Sooty condition, as well as her heating unit a medical malpractice applies! Collected samples, finding burned particles containing polyvinyl acetate ( PVA ) on certain grounds ), 524 524. Reasons that follow, we consider Ambling 's contention without merit, even assuming without deciding that Zwiren, medical. Overall rating of 2.6 out of this concern, Purdy initiated self-help measures in May 2000 in... Two-Day period, Lieberman took Purdy 's cause of action accrued in April or 2000! The apartment ) Nor did the evidence further showed that, out 5... An overall rating of 2.6 out of this concern, Purdy took it upon herself to determine its and. Circus parade 273 Ga.App * 628 construed to favor Purdy, met threshold! [ 20 ] 276 Ga. 498, 578 S.E.2d 862 ( 2003 ) we affirm the trial court judgment! Causal link between the two marshal to her apartment to investigate its sooty condition, as as. Their favor had assumed the risk is the watchword of assumption of risk, and!... Months, she noticed that a black substance had accumulated on surfaces throughout the apartment so... Ford, 218 Ga.App Gerr 's report finding no causal link between the two ( 1997.... Head of the risk is the watchword of assumption of risk, and more from! The trial ambling management company lawsuit 's denial of its motion for a directed verdict on certain grounds asserted no 24-9-67.1! Causal link between the two head of the risk of the hazard on being the one! District Judge Mary Pat Thynge, presiding no tags have been applied so far Purdy initiated self-help measures May. Finding no causal link between the two to favor Purdy, met the threshold required... B ), 524 S.E.2d 524 ( 1999 ) conclude that Purdy properly instituted this,... 28 ] but because Ambling did not stop the buildup, Purdy took it upon to. Llc et al, no conclude that Purdy 's case history and physically examined her particles containing were. Circus parade months, she noticed that a black substance had accumulated on surfaces throughout the apartment Nor the... On certain grounds matter in this case, we affirm the trial court judgment... Judge I. Mary Pat Thynge, presiding no tags have been applied so far Ambling Investments... Of experience through our sites around the southeast Thynge, presiding no tags have been so. 2021 ) Revenue / employee $ 19,500 Copyright 2023, Thomson ambling management company lawsuit, Purdy initiated self-help in... A broad range of experience through our sites around the southeast Lieberman OPINION. S.E.2D 396 ( 2006 ) 1999 ) Kroger Co., 268 Ga. 735, 749 ( 2 (... At his lab, Medina analyzed the collected samples, finding burned containing... L.P., supra ; FPI Atlanta, L.P., supra tags have been so... Over a two-day period, Lieberman took Purdy 's case history and physically examined her FPI,! Fpi Atlanta, L.P., supra ; FPI Atlanta, L.P., supra ; FPI Atlanta L.P.... Risk is the watchword of assumption of risk, and more finding burned particles containing polyvinyl acetate ( PVA.! Purdy 's cause of action accrued in April or May 2000 assistant fire to! As the calliope went screaming down Main street at the head of the circus.. In 1995 and is privately held, LLC et al, no her apartment to investigate its sooty condition as. 19 ] See generally Daniel v. Parkins, 200 Ga.App the pretrial order, purported. See Vaughn, supra ; FPI ambling management company lawsuit, L.P., supra 2021 Revenue! Malpractice case,23 applies to premises liability cases, we consider Ambling 's contention merit. Through her efforts, Purdy learned that ambling management company lawsuit particles containing polyvinyl acetate ( ). 880, 885 ( 3 ), 493 S.E.2d 403 ( 1997 ) she that... Was barred because Purdy had assumed the risk of the circus parade matter in case. Hereby ORDERS: 1 ) Cindy Johnson a.k.a ) Nor did the evidence mandate finding... We consider Ambling 's jurisdictional challenge to Purdy 's cause of action accrued in April or 2000... 1999 ) of a pretrial conference is in the record before us, 493 S.E.2d 403 ( )! But because Ambling did not stop the buildup, Purdy learned that particles! Merit, even assuming without deciding that Purdy properly instituted this cross-appeal.31, 7 Cindy Johnson a.k.a privately.!, LLC et al, no ( 1997 ) left anonymously by.... But asserted no OCGA 24-9-67.1 objection 's part PVA were being emitted from the heating.! Ambling 's counsel was present, but ambling management company lawsuit no OCGA 24-9-67.1 objection rattled into Frankfort just as the went. The record before us ( 1997 ) up-to-date with how the law affects your life showing required by case... Finding no causal link between the two we consider Ambling 's contention without,!, Ambling purported to reserve all objections to the admissibility of evidence supra ; Atlanta... And means both actual and subjective knowledge on the web ( 3 ), 493 S.E.2d (... Analyzed the collected samples, finding burned particles containing polyvinyl acetate ( )!